 | Not to be published in the official reports California Rules of Court, rule 1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 1115(b) 52.25 Kb.  1 | read |
| Lg electronics, Inc V. Bizcom Electronics, Inc Bizcom electronics, inc., Compal Electronics, Inc., and Sceptre Technologies, Inc., Defendants-Cross Appellants 86.01 Kb. 1 | read |
 | A primer on Forensic Animation by Steven P. Breaux And while many facets of these changes are easily understood and seamlessly adopted into how the law is practiced, there are some circumstances in which the application of technology is either misunderstood or viewed with suspicion 33.66 Kb. 1 | read |
| Not to be published in official reports California Rules of Court, rule 1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 1115(b) 61.02 Kb. 1 | read |
| Not to be published in the official reports California Rules of Court, rule 1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 1115(b) 75.08 Kb. 1 | read |
| Not to be published California Rules of Court, rule 1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 1115(b) 47.06 Kb. 1 | read |
| Holden at lusaka For the Appellant: Mr. K. Muzeng’a, Principal Legal Aid Counsel of Legal Aid Board 44.41 Kb. 1 | read |
| The republic of uganda in the court of appeal of uganda at kampala This appeal is from the judgement of the High Court at Kampala delivered by Hon. Justice J. P. M. Tabaro on 28. 09. 09 in a Judicial Review application number H. C. T-00-cv-ma-556 of 2008 84 Kb. 1 | read |
| Not to be published in official reports California Rules of Court, rule 1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 1115(b) 32.04 Kb. 1 | read |
| Homelessness, Human Rights, Litigation and Law Reform: a view from Canada Own Property and to Adequate Housing, subsequently approved by the United Nations Commission on Human Rights 146.11 Kb. 3 | read |
| A. O. Smith Corp V. Ftc, 530 F. 2d 515, 525 E. Brown (argued), Eugene D. Cohen, Joseph W. Mott, Lawrence G. D. Scarborough, Brown & Bain, P. A., Phoenix, Ariz., Edwin H. Taylor, Blakely, Sokoloff, Taylor & Zafman, Beverly Hills, Cal., Ronald L. Panitch, Jay K 187.21 Kb. 1 | read |
| Apple Computer Inc v. Franklin Computer Corp Apple Computer Inc v. Franklin Computer Corp., 714 F. 2d 1240 90.66 Kb. 1 | read |
| Certified for publication If the plaintiff claims internal defects in the smartphone are the sole cause of its failure to perform as advertised, is the network carrier for the smartphone a necessary party to the lawsuit? We conclude the network carrier is not a 52.66 Kb. 1 | read |
| Five Challenges for Regulating the Global Information Society Internet? Can existing law be adapted to regulate these activities? Are existing laws outmoded or inadequate? Are completely new laws needed to deal with Internet and other information technology developments? 93.51 Kb. 1 | read |
| Case of assanidze V. Georgia The case originated in an application (no. 71503/01) against Georgia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Georgian national 219.94 Kb. 5 | read |